Newsletter & News
Millions for a Few, Cuts for the Many
How the House v. NCAA settlement is accelerating a two-tiered system in college athletics
Updates on the House vs. NCAA appeals
How the amended SCORE Act may help or hurt athlete rights
Thoughts on Cody Campbell’s Saving College Sports
Collective Bargaining Isn’t If — It’s When
Why collective bargaining is gaining traction and the legal hurdles ahead
How UNC is pivoting with a pro-style front office
What schools opted out of the House settlement and why
Questions emerging around the $20.5M revenue cap
The Pay Era Begins
Expectations of the new era under House vs. NCAA begins
Wisconsin vs Miami: the first lawsuit over tampering in the revenue-share era
Why fewer college players are entering the NBA Draft
How NIL is moving into high school and what comes next
NCAA’s reconsideration of its sports betting rules
Putting the House Settlement into Practice
Key takeaways from the NCAA’s new 36-page Q&A
The uncertain future of Olympic sports
Funding the annual revenue-share cap
How NCAA eligibility rules are being put to the test in the new era of college athletics
College Sports Compliance Crisis. We've Been Here Before.
The House v. NCAA settlement and new commission are being hailed as progress, but they’ve created more questions than answers - especially around Title IX, athlete protection, and who’s really in charge.
Stamford Advocate: The end of amateurism? What college athletics isn’t saying out loud
With the NCAA v. House settlement approved, Christine shares her thoughts in the Stamford Advocate on what’s really at stake and why honest reform can’t wait.
A New Era, but Unfinished Business: Impacts of House vs. NCAA
Christine shares her thoughts on the cascading implications of the House v. NCAA settlement
